The Ukraine crisis illustrates a depressing truth: The closer America gets to war, the more likely Americans are to be called traitors for opposing it.
The entire conversation is insidious. From the comfort of our homes an ocean away, we sit at a table and, as if we were in the last two centuries, redrawing maps of the world for our own benefit. Imagine the anger if Mexico and Canada were having a conference on the future borders of the United States. We are largely in this mess because of the Kissingers and others who advised George H.W. Bush. It was Bush who told me, after Yeltsin's election, that he still considered Gorbachev to be the duly elected president of the Soviet Union. It was Bush who denied former Soviet Republics, and many of their new leaders (or old leaders in new roles) the tools they requested to build resilient democracies. If the world wants to resolve this inflamed conflict, we first must get the history right. We must get the Putin motivation right, and we have to listen to people who understand what is going on, not faux experts who have and will continue to create instability in the world, as men like Kissinger have done for over half a century. They are not experts, they are the men and women defending defenseless positions of their own making because they were wrongly put in positions of power and intentionally or not damaged or world. The Bush administration missed many opportunities as the USSR fell. The vassals and their disciples continue to beat that drum, with the addition of tragic actors, allowed to pretend they are journalists (like Tucker Carlson) who salivate over the prospect of a dictator ruling the USA. US foreign policy is and has been a horror show for so many years that it is hard to start making corrections, but following any of what the two sides are pushing for now will potentially further destabilize the United States and give Putin what he really wants, carte blanche to run much of the world as he sees fit. He knows Biden is in a hole and the extremists waiting in the wings are looking for their chance to take all they learned over the Trump years and January 6th, and turn it into a win. Putin certainly dislikes NATO on his doorstep, the Tzars and Soviets always wanted a buffer zone, but he now has an opportunity to propel himself to a new level of global leadership and we in the west cannot get out of our own way. From the euphoria of Ukraine's independence back in 1991 and the hopes and dreams of a democratic world, to one controlled by strongmen and tyrants, in large part to the misguided actions of American "experts", is heartbreaking.
Thanks for saying what needs to be said. As someone who leans toward progressive domestic policy, I find it disheartening to put it mildly that the conversation over Ukraine and Russia, especially among Democrats, has been effectively divided into two siloes. You are either for self-determination in Ukraine, that nascent democracy whose people are just striving to be free, or in league with the evil dictator Putin. That the situation could be much more complex than that simple binary, or that we, the US, may have had a hand in creating this impasse, is simply not up for discussion. Democrats, like Republicans, need a foreign villain, in this case Putin, who, according most major media outlets, is practically the spawn of Satan himself. It does no good to point out just how asinine this all is, as we march toward war over a country that is as corrupt and dysfunctional as Russia to 'save' it from its neighbor.
Ok, so being a dove is not being a traitor. I agree. It might be clearer to say "X is playing into or giving unwitting support to . . .". Or, it might even be better--in almost all instances of disagreement--to not assume bad faith, but to address on the merits or at least engage in dialogue to clarify different positions and, maybe, change a mind or two. That said, do we stand by as Ukraine is over-run and then subjected to the finely honed oppression machine that is modern Russia or do we give the Ukrainians the tools to fight back? The doves either aren't answering (Mr. Beinart, for example) or they are sadly consigning Ukrainians to their fate. We don't have to go to war with Russia to be on the right side of this fight.
I sent the following Message to all 100 US Senators since Friday. Only 1 Senator with instant name recognition replied, proffering the standard anti-Russia/Putin Propaganda.
Good Day Senator,
As a World Citizen Child of God at 77, and a Canadian, I sent the same Message to all 100 Senators November 5,8,15 &16, not as Representatives of Local Parochial interests, but as National and International Leaders.
It took that long finding an address and ZIP code in all 50 States since the Senate email system has no provision to hear opinions other than from Americans. Stating I'm Canadian in the 1st sentence & using my actual name and email address in the Senate forms, a Senate majority sends me their Newsletters without addressing anything in the November Message concerned with US Domestic Developments as if whoever opens the email didn't ever read it.
This Message also going to all 100 Senators concerns the Dangerous Developments on the International Stage. Senators have almost as much influence collectively as the Executive Branch. I can only hope and pray Saner heads prevail, although from what I see on CNN, MSNBC & FOX, that seems unlikely to reduce International tensions, but increase them.
Putin doesn't want War. No sane person would want MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION unless there is a subconscious desire for SUICIDE BY NUKES.
All Putin wants is NATO to stop advancing to Russia's border just like Americans didn't want Soviet missiles in Cuba. In 1962, the US was ready to start Armageddon/WWIII over Russian missiles in Cuba reacting to the US putting their missiles aimed at Russia in new NATO Member Turkey.
Just like the US in 1962, Putin correctly sees the steady incremental advance of NATO to the border of Russia since the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and the Military Warsaw Pact opposite NATO, is not defensive, but offensive. I see that Independently watching from CanaDa.
He is following that 1962 US playbook. If it was Good when the US did it, is it EVIL because Putin is drawing his red line just like the US already did in 1962?
US paid Propagandists use words like, "since Russia's aggression in Ukraine." That's how subtle Propaganda is.
Trucks on Russia's side of the border, covered in snow and parked for weeks, is aggression? What is aggressive, is the US pouring $Billions of weapons into Ukraine, with NATO troops already in Ukraine, with more possibly on the way, inflaming the situation on the ground.
This confirms in Putin's eyes it's the US as the hegemon beating the War Drums, leading to Armageddon/WWIII the US put on the table in 1962.
According to CNN & MSNBC News reports, the Ukrainians themselves are not worried about a Russian invasion. This is a US freak out to distract from the increasing Domestic problems and Divisions I wrote about in November.
This is more interesting for me to watch unfolding from CanaDa because of this 1 line among so many more in my Curriculum Vitae, as recorded by The Kansas City Times September 13, 1976,
"He wanted to bring to the Public’s attention "an idea being put out subtly and deceptively” by the government that we have to get prepared for a War with Russia.”
That 1976 FUTURE is NOW with the Revelation of the details GENERALLY unfolding in the spirit of the letter.
With the benefit of 45 years hindsight, the last 8 years of intensified Military, FBI and Intelligence “experts” on TV constantly, unanimously, demonizing Putin and Russia since the 2014 US orchestrated Coup/regime change of the Russian friendly government, installing an Neo-Nazi anti-Russian government, the American People have been prepared as the majority of comments in all Washington Post articles on the US-Russian Tug of War over Ukraine prove beyond any doubt.
As a further Sign of The Times The Kansas City Times did a followup on ALL SOULS DAY, November 2, 1976, publishing this Historical Newspaper record:
You may imagine my Surprise and Wonder when the TV movie 'THE DAY AFTER' Kansas City was incinerated in a Nuclear Holocaust was shown 7 years to the month later, on November 20, 1983?
Most probably, I was the only person on Earth watching it that night to NOTE at THE END, the movie pauses at the same picture frame The Kansas City Times published on ALL SOULS DAY, November 2, 1976, this being the TV screenshot:
Those Historical records are Signs of the Times of where this World is at Today. They can dismissed as being of no consequence, but the Historical Record cannot be changed.
Only Time will tell. Reading about and watching the hyped up US News Today, that Time may be sooner than most People dare think?
Obviously, I had nothing to do with those Historical FACTS come into being other than being a Messenger. Then and Now!
I thank God I'm still alive at 77 able to point to the Historical Records
I think there’s room to be both highly sympathetic to Ukraine and feel it’s right to stand up for their own rights as a nation while also acknowledging that American Russian policy stank from 1991 to now. I completely agree that NATO expansion eastward was a mistake and a sign of our own hubris during the (now obviously brief) period of dominance. We knew, or should have known, that NATO expansion would overextend America and that Russia cares far more about security in Eastern Europe than we do, and that Western European relations with Russia would be quite different than our own. America doesn’t need Russia economically, Europe does, and this is a simple question of geography m
That being said we did expand NATO, we are now forced to care about their security and we can analyze the situation for ourselves. Ukraine has been invaded by Russia, twice, and while I don’t think Russia will invade Ukraine again (they don’t need to) that doesn’t suddenly make Russia a righteous actor. Russian demands are unreasonable given America’s commitments in the regions and this crisis is infuriatingly pointless. America isn’t going to stop Russia from meddling in Ukraine, Ukraine isn’t going to join NATO, so we’re bickering and sabre rattling over what?
America can’t give up our commitments to our Eastern European partners, Russia knows this, nor should we. America shouldn’t end our open door policy either. Instead diplomacy should focus on what’s possible. Russia knows America isn’t interested in fighting a war with Russia, we have other concerns elsewhere that are far more pressing than the Donbas. Russia senses weakness, and an opportunity to claim victim hood. But let’s also be real here: Russia violently occupied Eastern Europe for five decades in many peoples lifetimes: there’s a reason why Eastern Europe joined NATO, and it isn’t because Russia was in the right.
Which to me makes the argument that American policy was wrong a strange one. It’s not a moral failing that the US wants to protect it’s allies from a foreign power. Perhaps we shouldn’t be there but that says more about us than it does about Putin.
You may be right in a historical sense, but I just don't see the specifics. Most of the criticism I've seen has been of pro-Putin neofascists like Carlson, not "all objectors". And from the actual hawks, I haven't seen much pro-war jingoism, either.
In fact, out of all the foreign policy crises I've ever lived through, this is probably the only one where I HAVEN'T actually seen the doves and hawks at each other's throats all that much. The main difference is that the media is raising far more of a stink than they ever have. I feel like a lot of it is coming from the post-Trump media hangover, where they're desperate for something to make headlines every day like Trump did.
David, any criticism from the left is drowned by vehement anti-Putin rhetoric, which has been ongoing ever since they blamed Putin for Hill's loss in 2016. The middle has been silent, or just blissfully ignorant. A few, like Ro Khanna, have been voices of reason lost in the wilderness. The New York Times, which has a lot of reporters around the world, has been missing in action when it comes to covering Ukraine. The narrative of Putin's mendacity, in contrast to our wonderful intentions, is never clarified by specifics like war crimes committed in eastern Ukraine by neofascist Ukrainian paramilitaries. And most of all, there is the selective amnesia on display when it comes to our own behavior around the world, the flashing red double standard that they just can't see. Do as we say, not as we do is the motto.
Sorry, I just don't buy it. I've always been a foreign policy moderate - I see the value in points made by both hawks and doves, I understand the deleterious effects of the blob, and I've never just stood in knee-jerk-reflex with either side.
Right now, the doves are acting like just because they were right about certain aspects of Iraq and Afghanistan, they're always right. That's dumb. America didn't aggressively snap up Eastern Europe into NATO after the CW ended; Eastern Europe WANTED to join. These countries are looking at a genuine strategic calculus of not wanting to be Russian subjects again.
Take the "anti-Putin" media takes out of it, and just listen to what he's saying. Do you honestly agree that Ukraine has "never been a country"? Do you have any historic notion of why Russians have always had their eyes on it (surprise - it made up a huge chunk of the Russian Empire's economy)? Do you think that he's *not* an authoritarian who's rigged his own country's electoral system and assassinated opponents of his kleptocracy?
Just because we have a sordid history of imperialism doesn't mean we have to sit by and watch a revanchist asshole Make Imperialism Great Again.
The entire conversation is insidious. From the comfort of our homes an ocean away, we sit at a table and, as if we were in the last two centuries, redrawing maps of the world for our own benefit. Imagine the anger if Mexico and Canada were having a conference on the future borders of the United States. We are largely in this mess because of the Kissingers and others who advised George H.W. Bush. It was Bush who told me, after Yeltsin's election, that he still considered Gorbachev to be the duly elected president of the Soviet Union. It was Bush who denied former Soviet Republics, and many of their new leaders (or old leaders in new roles) the tools they requested to build resilient democracies. If the world wants to resolve this inflamed conflict, we first must get the history right. We must get the Putin motivation right, and we have to listen to people who understand what is going on, not faux experts who have and will continue to create instability in the world, as men like Kissinger have done for over half a century. They are not experts, they are the men and women defending defenseless positions of their own making because they were wrongly put in positions of power and intentionally or not damaged or world. The Bush administration missed many opportunities as the USSR fell. The vassals and their disciples continue to beat that drum, with the addition of tragic actors, allowed to pretend they are journalists (like Tucker Carlson) who salivate over the prospect of a dictator ruling the USA. US foreign policy is and has been a horror show for so many years that it is hard to start making corrections, but following any of what the two sides are pushing for now will potentially further destabilize the United States and give Putin what he really wants, carte blanche to run much of the world as he sees fit. He knows Biden is in a hole and the extremists waiting in the wings are looking for their chance to take all they learned over the Trump years and January 6th, and turn it into a win. Putin certainly dislikes NATO on his doorstep, the Tzars and Soviets always wanted a buffer zone, but he now has an opportunity to propel himself to a new level of global leadership and we in the west cannot get out of our own way. From the euphoria of Ukraine's independence back in 1991 and the hopes and dreams of a democratic world, to one controlled by strongmen and tyrants, in large part to the misguided actions of American "experts", is heartbreaking.
Thanks for saying what needs to be said. As someone who leans toward progressive domestic policy, I find it disheartening to put it mildly that the conversation over Ukraine and Russia, especially among Democrats, has been effectively divided into two siloes. You are either for self-determination in Ukraine, that nascent democracy whose people are just striving to be free, or in league with the evil dictator Putin. That the situation could be much more complex than that simple binary, or that we, the US, may have had a hand in creating this impasse, is simply not up for discussion. Democrats, like Republicans, need a foreign villain, in this case Putin, who, according most major media outlets, is practically the spawn of Satan himself. It does no good to point out just how asinine this all is, as we march toward war over a country that is as corrupt and dysfunctional as Russia to 'save' it from its neighbor.
Ok, so being a dove is not being a traitor. I agree. It might be clearer to say "X is playing into or giving unwitting support to . . .". Or, it might even be better--in almost all instances of disagreement--to not assume bad faith, but to address on the merits or at least engage in dialogue to clarify different positions and, maybe, change a mind or two. That said, do we stand by as Ukraine is over-run and then subjected to the finely honed oppression machine that is modern Russia or do we give the Ukrainians the tools to fight back? The doves either aren't answering (Mr. Beinart, for example) or they are sadly consigning Ukrainians to their fate. We don't have to go to war with Russia to be on the right side of this fight.
As for how we got here, it all started in 1917.
I sent the following Message to all 100 US Senators since Friday. Only 1 Senator with instant name recognition replied, proffering the standard anti-Russia/Putin Propaganda.
Good Day Senator,
As a World Citizen Child of God at 77, and a Canadian, I sent the same Message to all 100 Senators November 5,8,15 &16, not as Representatives of Local Parochial interests, but as National and International Leaders.
It took that long finding an address and ZIP code in all 50 States since the Senate email system has no provision to hear opinions other than from Americans. Stating I'm Canadian in the 1st sentence & using my actual name and email address in the Senate forms, a Senate majority sends me their Newsletters without addressing anything in the November Message concerned with US Domestic Developments as if whoever opens the email didn't ever read it.
This Message also going to all 100 Senators concerns the Dangerous Developments on the International Stage. Senators have almost as much influence collectively as the Executive Branch. I can only hope and pray Saner heads prevail, although from what I see on CNN, MSNBC & FOX, that seems unlikely to reduce International tensions, but increase them.
Putin doesn't want War. No sane person would want MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION unless there is a subconscious desire for SUICIDE BY NUKES.
All Putin wants is NATO to stop advancing to Russia's border just like Americans didn't want Soviet missiles in Cuba. In 1962, the US was ready to start Armageddon/WWIII over Russian missiles in Cuba reacting to the US putting their missiles aimed at Russia in new NATO Member Turkey.
Americans aren't exceptional.
Well a religious nut for Putin or just another phony Russian Bot!
Just like the US in 1962, Putin correctly sees the steady incremental advance of NATO to the border of Russia since the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and the Military Warsaw Pact opposite NATO, is not defensive, but offensive. I see that Independently watching from CanaDa.
He is following that 1962 US playbook. If it was Good when the US did it, is it EVIL because Putin is drawing his red line just like the US already did in 1962?
US paid Propagandists use words like, "since Russia's aggression in Ukraine." That's how subtle Propaganda is.
Trucks on Russia's side of the border, covered in snow and parked for weeks, is aggression? What is aggressive, is the US pouring $Billions of weapons into Ukraine, with NATO troops already in Ukraine, with more possibly on the way, inflaming the situation on the ground.
This confirms in Putin's eyes it's the US as the hegemon beating the War Drums, leading to Armageddon/WWIII the US put on the table in 1962.
According to CNN & MSNBC News reports, the Ukrainians themselves are not worried about a Russian invasion. This is a US freak out to distract from the increasing Domestic problems and Divisions I wrote about in November.
This is more interesting for me to watch unfolding from CanaDa because of this 1 line among so many more in my Curriculum Vitae, as recorded by The Kansas City Times September 13, 1976,
"He wanted to bring to the Public’s attention "an idea being put out subtly and deceptively” by the government that we have to get prepared for a War with Russia.”
That 1976 FUTURE is NOW with the Revelation of the details GENERALLY unfolding in the spirit of the letter.
With the benefit of 45 years hindsight, the last 8 years of intensified Military, FBI and Intelligence “experts” on TV constantly, unanimously, demonizing Putin and Russia since the 2014 US orchestrated Coup/regime change of the Russian friendly government, installing an Neo-Nazi anti-Russian government, the American People have been prepared as the majority of comments in all Washington Post articles on the US-Russian Tug of War over Ukraine prove beyond any doubt.
As a further Sign of The Times The Kansas City Times did a followup on ALL SOULS DAY, November 2, 1976, publishing this Historical Newspaper record:
https://ray032.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/kansas-city-times-november-2-1976-all-souls-day-2.jpg
You may imagine my Surprise and Wonder when the TV movie 'THE DAY AFTER' Kansas City was incinerated in a Nuclear Holocaust was shown 7 years to the month later, on November 20, 1983?
Most probably, I was the only person on Earth watching it that night to NOTE at THE END, the movie pauses at the same picture frame The Kansas City Times published on ALL SOULS DAY, November 2, 1976, this being the TV screenshot:
https://ray032.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/final-frames-1983-movie-the-day-after-kansas-city-was-destroyed.jpg
Those Historical records are Signs of the Times of where this World is at Today. They can dismissed as being of no consequence, but the Historical Record cannot be changed.
Only Time will tell. Reading about and watching the hyped up US News Today, that Time may be sooner than most People dare think?
Obviously, I had nothing to do with those Historical FACTS come into being other than being a Messenger. Then and Now!
I thank God I'm still alive at 77 able to point to the Historical Records
I think there’s room to be both highly sympathetic to Ukraine and feel it’s right to stand up for their own rights as a nation while also acknowledging that American Russian policy stank from 1991 to now. I completely agree that NATO expansion eastward was a mistake and a sign of our own hubris during the (now obviously brief) period of dominance. We knew, or should have known, that NATO expansion would overextend America and that Russia cares far more about security in Eastern Europe than we do, and that Western European relations with Russia would be quite different than our own. America doesn’t need Russia economically, Europe does, and this is a simple question of geography m
That being said we did expand NATO, we are now forced to care about their security and we can analyze the situation for ourselves. Ukraine has been invaded by Russia, twice, and while I don’t think Russia will invade Ukraine again (they don’t need to) that doesn’t suddenly make Russia a righteous actor. Russian demands are unreasonable given America’s commitments in the regions and this crisis is infuriatingly pointless. America isn’t going to stop Russia from meddling in Ukraine, Ukraine isn’t going to join NATO, so we’re bickering and sabre rattling over what?
America can’t give up our commitments to our Eastern European partners, Russia knows this, nor should we. America shouldn’t end our open door policy either. Instead diplomacy should focus on what’s possible. Russia knows America isn’t interested in fighting a war with Russia, we have other concerns elsewhere that are far more pressing than the Donbas. Russia senses weakness, and an opportunity to claim victim hood. But let’s also be real here: Russia violently occupied Eastern Europe for five decades in many peoples lifetimes: there’s a reason why Eastern Europe joined NATO, and it isn’t because Russia was in the right.
Which to me makes the argument that American policy was wrong a strange one. It’s not a moral failing that the US wants to protect it’s allies from a foreign power. Perhaps we shouldn’t be there but that says more about us than it does about Putin.
Great summary of the situation
You may be right in a historical sense, but I just don't see the specifics. Most of the criticism I've seen has been of pro-Putin neofascists like Carlson, not "all objectors". And from the actual hawks, I haven't seen much pro-war jingoism, either.
In fact, out of all the foreign policy crises I've ever lived through, this is probably the only one where I HAVEN'T actually seen the doves and hawks at each other's throats all that much. The main difference is that the media is raising far more of a stink than they ever have. I feel like a lot of it is coming from the post-Trump media hangover, where they're desperate for something to make headlines every day like Trump did.
David, any criticism from the left is drowned by vehement anti-Putin rhetoric, which has been ongoing ever since they blamed Putin for Hill's loss in 2016. The middle has been silent, or just blissfully ignorant. A few, like Ro Khanna, have been voices of reason lost in the wilderness. The New York Times, which has a lot of reporters around the world, has been missing in action when it comes to covering Ukraine. The narrative of Putin's mendacity, in contrast to our wonderful intentions, is never clarified by specifics like war crimes committed in eastern Ukraine by neofascist Ukrainian paramilitaries. And most of all, there is the selective amnesia on display when it comes to our own behavior around the world, the flashing red double standard that they just can't see. Do as we say, not as we do is the motto.
Sorry, I just don't buy it. I've always been a foreign policy moderate - I see the value in points made by both hawks and doves, I understand the deleterious effects of the blob, and I've never just stood in knee-jerk-reflex with either side.
Right now, the doves are acting like just because they were right about certain aspects of Iraq and Afghanistan, they're always right. That's dumb. America didn't aggressively snap up Eastern Europe into NATO after the CW ended; Eastern Europe WANTED to join. These countries are looking at a genuine strategic calculus of not wanting to be Russian subjects again.
Take the "anti-Putin" media takes out of it, and just listen to what he's saying. Do you honestly agree that Ukraine has "never been a country"? Do you have any historic notion of why Russians have always had their eyes on it (surprise - it made up a huge chunk of the Russian Empire's economy)? Do you think that he's *not* an authoritarian who's rigged his own country's electoral system and assassinated opponents of his kleptocracy?
Just because we have a sordid history of imperialism doesn't mean we have to sit by and watch a revanchist asshole Make Imperialism Great Again.